Comments on: “A Defense of Abortion” Judith Jarvis Thomson http://www.hundiejo.com/a-defense-of-abortion-judith-jarvis-thomson Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:59:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Hundie Jo [dot] Com » Blog Archive » The Abortion Debate Part I http://www.hundiejo.com/a-defense-of-abortion-judith-jarvis-thomson#comment-1260 Hundie Jo [dot] Com » Blog Archive » The Abortion Debate Part I Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:24:43 +0000 http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1260 [...] to life and the mother has a right to life, then that changes the whole shape of the argument. Judith Jarvis Thompson has argued that even if we assume for the moment that the fetus has a right to life, a pro-abortion position [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1260','Hundie Jo &#91;dot&#93; Com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Abortion Debate Part I'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1260','Hundie Jo &#91;dot&#93; Com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Abortion Debate Part I','&#91;...&#93; to life and the mother has a right to life, then that changes the whole shape of the argument. Judith Jarvis Thompson has argued that even if we assume for the moment that the fetus has a right to life, a pro-abortion position &#91;...&#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] to life and the mother has a right to life, then that changes the whole shape of the argument. Judith Jarvis Thompson has argued that even if we assume for the moment that the fetus has a right to life, a pro-abortion position [...]
Reply - Quote
]]> By: The Unsound Argument » Blog Archive » The Abortion Debate Part I http://www.hundiejo.com/a-defense-of-abortion-judith-jarvis-thomson#comment-1195 The Unsound Argument » Blog Archive » The Abortion Debate Part I Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:23:33 +0000 http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=26#comment-1195 [...] If the fetus has no right to life, as Marry Ann Warren believes, then of course Pippin is correct. The rights of the mother would then outweigh the rights of the fetus. If, however, the fetus has a right to life and the mother has a right to life, then that changes the whole shape of the argument. Judith Jarvis Thompson has argued[6] that even if we assume for the moment that the fetus has a right to life, a pro-abortion position can still be maintained (My notes on her article are not completely entered into that post, please bear with me). [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1195','The Unsound Argument &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Abortion Debate Part I'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1195','The Unsound Argument &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Abortion Debate Part I','&#91;...&#93; If the fetus has no right to life, as Marry Ann Warren believes, then of course Pippin is correct. The rights of the mother would then outweigh the rights of the fetus. If, however, the fetus has a right to life and the mother has a right to life, then that changes the whole shape of the argument. Judith Jarvis Thompson has argued&#91;6&#93; that even if we assume for the moment that the fetus has a right to life, a pro-abortion position can still be maintained (My notes on her article are not completely entered into that post, please bear with me). &#91;...&#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] If the fetus has no right to life, as Marry Ann Warren believes, then of course Pippin is correct. The rights of the mother would then outweigh the rights of the fetus. If, however, the fetus has a right to life and the mother has a right to life, then that changes the whole shape of the argument. Judith Jarvis Thompson has argued[6] that even if we assume for the moment that the fetus has a right to life, a pro-abortion position can still be maintained (My notes on her article are not completely entered into that post, please bear with me). [...]
Reply - Quote
]]>