Comments on: Is Emotion a requirement of Personhood? http://www.hundiejo.com/is-emotion-a-requirement-of-personhood Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:12:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Hundie Jo [dot] Com » Blog Archive » The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice http://www.hundiejo.com/is-emotion-a-requirement-of-personhood/comment-page-1#comment-1868 Hundie Jo [dot] Com » Blog Archive » The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:38:18 +0000 http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=35#comment-1868 [...] we are to accept Carmen Price’s conclusion that in order for S to be considered to be a person, it must be capable of non-rational behaviors, [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1868','Hundie Jo &#91;dot&#93; Com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1868','Hundie Jo &#91;dot&#93; Com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice','&#91;...&#93; we are to accept Carmen Price&#8217;s conclusion that in order for S to be considered to be a person, it must be capable of non-rational behaviors, &#91;...&#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] we are to accept Carmen Price’s conclusion that in order for S to be considered to be a person, it must be capable of non-rational behaviors, [...]
Reply - Quote
]]> By: Hundie Jo [dot] Com » Blog Archive » More on God and Change http://www.hundiejo.com/is-emotion-a-requirement-of-personhood/comment-page-1#comment-1867 Hundie Jo [dot] Com » Blog Archive » More on God and Change Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:30:15 +0000 http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=35#comment-1867 [...] The lynch-pin of the argument and one of criticisms of a perfect and unchangeable God is number six. In exercising free will, one is changed, whether or not that one is a person or God. Further more, I like what Rhoda hints at towards the end of the post, where he implies that does not employ mere logic in His exercise in free will. This point was first brought to my attention by Carmen Price, a philosophy doctoral student at Washington University in her capstone paper at Columbia College: “The Necessity of Considering Motivations…”. [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1867','Hundie Jo &#91;dot&#93; Com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; More on God and Change'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1867','Hundie Jo &#91;dot&#93; Com &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; More on God and Change','&#91;...&#93; The lynch-pin of the argument and one of criticisms of a perfect and unchangeable God is number six. In exercising free will, one is changed, whether or not that one is a person or God. Further more, I like what Rhoda hints at towards the end of the post, where he implies that does not employ mere logic in His exercise in free will. This point was first brought to my attention by Carmen Price, a philosophy doctoral student at Washington University in her capstone paper at Columbia College: âThe Necessity of Considering Motivationsâ¦â. &#91;...&#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] The lynch-pin of the argument and one of criticisms of a perfect and unchangeable God is number six. In exercising free will, one is changed, whether or not that one is a person or God. Further more, I like what Rhoda hints at towards the end of the post, where he implies that does not employ mere logic in His exercise in free will. This point was first brought to my attention by Carmen Price, a philosophy doctoral student at Washington University in her capstone paper at Columbia College: “The Necessity of Considering Motivations…”. [...]
Reply - Quote
]]> By: The Unsound Argument » More on God and Change http://www.hundiejo.com/is-emotion-a-requirement-of-personhood/comment-page-1#comment-1197 The Unsound Argument » More on God and Change Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:13:26 +0000 http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=35#comment-1197 [...] The lynch-pin of the argument and one of critisms of a perfect and unchangeable God is number six. In excersizing free will, one is changed, whether or not that one is a person or God. Further more, I like what Rhoda hints at towards the end of the post, where he implies that does not employ mere logic in His excersie in free will. This point was first brought to my attention by Carmen Price, a philosophy doctoral student at Washinton University in her capstone paper at Columbia College: “The Necessity of Considering Motivations…”. [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1197','The Unsound Argument &raquo; More on God and Change'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1197','The Unsound Argument &raquo; More on God and Change','&#91;...&#93; The lynch-pin of the argument and one of critisms of a perfect and unchangeable God is number six. In excersizing free will, one is changed, whether or not that one is a person or God. Further more, I like what Rhoda hints at towards the end of the post, where he implies that does not employ mere logic in His excersie in free will. This point was first brought to my attention by Carmen Price, a philosophy doctoral student at Washinton University in her capstone paper at Columbia College: âThe Necessity of Considering Motivationsâ¦â. &#91;...&#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] The lynch-pin of the argument and one of critisms of a perfect and unchangeable God is number six. In excersizing free will, one is changed, whether or not that one is a person or God. Further more, I like what Rhoda hints at towards the end of the post, where he implies that does not employ mere logic in His excersie in free will. This point was first brought to my attention by Carmen Price, a philosophy doctoral student at Washinton University in her capstone paper at Columbia College: “The Necessity of Considering Motivations…”. [...]
Reply - Quote
]]> By: The Unsound Argument » Blog Archive » The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice http://www.hundiejo.com/is-emotion-a-requirement-of-personhood/comment-page-1#comment-1196 The Unsound Argument » Blog Archive » The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:02:11 +0000 http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=35#comment-1196 [...] If we are to accept Carmen Price’s conclusion[1] that in order for S to be considered to be a person, it must be capable of non-rational behaviors, otherwise known as emotion; then what does that mean for personhood theory? Must all persons have a non-rational basis? [...]<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1196','The Unsound Argument &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice'); return false;">Reply</a> - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1196','The Unsound Argument &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; The Emotion Requirement for Personhood and Choice','&#91;...&#93; If we are to accept Carmen Price&#8217;s conclusion&#91;1&#93; that in order for S to be considered to be a person, it must be capable of non-rational behaviors, otherwise known as emotion; then what does that mean for personhood theory? Must all persons have a non-rational basis? &#91;...&#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div> [...] If we are to accept Carmen Price’s conclusion[1] that in order for S to be considered to be a person, it must be capable of non-rational behaviors, otherwise known as emotion; then what does that mean for personhood theory? Must all persons have a non-rational basis? [...]
Reply - Quote
]]>