Hundie Jo [Dot] Com

NBA Playoff Predictions: Round 2

Henry Imler May 7th, 2007

East:

1) Pistons vs 2) Bulls
Sorry Bulls fans - you whipped the Heat, but the Pistons have gotten
better and better all year long and now actually have some offense in
the middle.
Pistons in 5

2) Cavs vs 6) Nets
This is a tough one to call, but because of Kidd’s aging legs and
Carter’s inconsistent play, I am giving it to the hungry James.
Cavs in 7

West
8) Warriors vs 4) Jazz
As much as I want to get on the Warrior bandwagon, I have to go with the Jazz, whose rock-solid approach beat T-Mac.
Jazz in 6

2)Spurs vs 3)Suns
Hmm, I am thinking it is the Sun’s year. They have their big man back.
However, no Nash = no chance. Eh… Nash does not play defense, so no
chance at foul trouble. The Spurs could have been beat in each and
every one of the games in their last series. However, that also speaks
to their poise. They have been there and they have done that. However,
the Suns are more balanced and steady than the Nuggets. I know, I know,
I am sounding like Data here.

Suns in 7 (Mostly to spite Alane)

2 Responses to “NBA Playoff Predictions: Round 2”

  1. dave [Visitor]on 07 May 2007 at 7:56 am

    Sorry Bulls fans - you whipped the Heat, but the Pistons have gotten better and better all year long

    Umm…
    so have the Bulls. The Bulls were probably the best team in basketball,
    but at least the best team in the East, over the last month or two of
    the season.

    I still say the Bulls win in 6.

    Cavs over Nets in 6.

    Jazz over the Warriors in 5. The Warriors are not that good, they just
    know how to beat Dallas. And Utah has been one of the most underrated
    teams in the league all year.


    Spurs over Suns in 6. The Suns may be more balanced and steady than the
    Nuggets, but they are not more balances and steady than the Spurs.

  2. Honzo [Member]on 08 May 2007 at 2:21 am

    they have. I just don’t see them beating the Pistons with Jump shots and no inside game.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply