RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Christ’

Commented on “Theology for the Masses”

16 Dec

Good answer. Especially when it comes to the Psalms, structure is important, I agree completely. I share your desire and concerns on your second point as well. I am pretty wary of reading the Psalms in lieu of Christ because I have seen their context and structure abused beyond belief in making everything about Christ. I am probably a bit behind you in being able to guard against it. Right now with the Old Testament I’m trying to read it as a 2nd temple Jew would have read it so that in a few years I can reread it with the climax in mind.



Originally posted as a comment
by hundiejo
on Theology for the Masses using DISQUS.

 

Reeds Dedication Prayer and Scripture

04 Dec

DSCF0051 Reed was dedicated a few weeks ago.  This was Meredith and I’d prayer and verse for him.  We were asked to keep it as short as possible, so that it would fit on the certificate.

Pledge: Hope/Prayer: That the Spirit would lead Reed to a saving faith in the Son and that the Father would use him as an agent for the reconciliation of all things.

Scripture:  For God in all his fullness was pleased to live in Christ, and through him God reconciled everything to himself. He made peace with everything in heaven and on earth by means of Christ’s blood on the cross. (Col 1:19-20 NLT)

 

Toward a Western Response to the Eastern and Southern Churches

03 Dec

We, as the North-Western Church, must tread carefully as we awaken to the present, past, and future realities of the Eastern and Southern Churches.   This post is a collection of some helpful ideas to that end. In many ways have many things which these other Churches lack. Chief among these are education, history, wealth, and political influence. This is not to say that we are exclusive holders of the Christian tradition or the exclusive keepers of the true truth which is truly true… as we have done in the past and do to ourselves so very often. The question before us is how to speak and listen without overpowering the Christian Other. We need to invest, tell our stories, plant and support seminaries, rethink missions, and place political pressure on our governments the whole while seeking the cause of Christ and listening to the Spirit while submitting to the Father.

Terminology and imagined hegemony

Just as there is no monolithic North-Western Church, there is likewise no monolithic Eastern, African, South American, Southern, South Eastern, Asian Church. This is the case for two very important reasons, internal diversity, and external unity. Each movement, denomination, congregation is unique to itself and lumping them together is dangerous and inaccurate.

It is dangerous insofar as it serves to maintain old and create new stereotypes.

It is inaccurate because the Cherubim and Seraphim movement has little to do with Musama Disco Christo Church though they are both in West Africa and neither of them have much to do with or connection to the congregations in the various disparate countries in South America or Asia.

We are better equipped to use such terms as Northern Church, Southern Church, African Church and the like as geographic containers rather than activators of essential features. However, despite this, Jenkins builds an undeniable case that the center of Christianity has and will continue to shift South and East. We in the West in the Church and the Academy are barely aware of this situation.

Investment, not Profit

In both Christian and Secular circles, dumping is the most common way we seek to help those in need. However, dumping aid upon people only serves to enslave them to our aid, replacing their dependence upon hunger with a dependence upon us while we pat ourselves on the back.[1] What we need instead is a de-emphasis upon aid and an emphasis upon investment in their congregations and societal structures. This can happen on several levels, individuals through micro-finance organizations such as Kiva or Opportunity International, at the congregation or denominational level, and finally on the governmental level as wield our political clout.

While we are doing this, let us remember the Biblical distaste for usury and let our investments be motivated by Kingdom building, not the great and powerful god ROI.[2] Let us be satisfied with 90% of the world’s wealth.

Gathering around the Campfire

Jenkins did a great job detailing the ancient roots of Christianity in Africa and Asia, which often hundreds of years older than our own faith trajectories. [3] As many of my fellow students said, we would be wise to listen to their stories and their wisdom.

They are correct, though we often sacrifice our stories at the altar of the unknown god paying our colonial debts.

However, we Western Christians have a long tradition full of stories, conflicts, mistakes, and triumphs as well. We can and should offer up this collection of stories to the rest of the body of Christ, not as authoritative, but as wisdom. We have faced many of the problems our sisters have faced. We were once persecuted; we were once poor.

We once drank from the cup of political power and are stained in blood by that sin.[4]

Our wisdom can be offered, though it cannot come without us listening to their stories. Once we think we own the wisdom, we have truly lost it. We can listen to their Now; they to our Not Yet.

The most difficult area here is the formulation of doctrine. Orthodoxy in middle America will look different than Orthodoxy in South Korea both of which will look different than Orthodoxy in the Congo. We have to remember that the Spirit speaking though the Bible is our prime authority and even then the revealed truths contained therein were formulated inside a specific geographic, temporal, cultural, linguistic location.

Teaching People to Fish

To help foster the growth and development of Christians in other areas of the world as loving siblings we need to found and support seminaries across the globe. And not just the seminaries themselves, we need to support students themselves.

In these seminaries scholars should be encouraged to write their traditions to give them a voice which can be exported to other areas of the globe.

While we are at it, it would be profitable to create some sort of interchange program wherein global seminaries send scholars to seminaries in other parts of the world. This would aid in a truly global conversation.

Curbing Missionary Redundancy

Central to recognizing the agency of Other Christians is the acknowledgement of and noncompetition with Other Christian missionary endeavors. Jenkins notes that this is one of the prime sources of inter-Christian conflict and we would do well to avoid it.[5] Unless there be a true heart of darkness that the gospel has not infected, we should focus our missionary efforts here at home where we are the most effective (where religion is dying)or partner with existing churches in the area.

Abusing Political Power for the Good of the Kingdom

If we truly see ourselves as one organ in the global-historical Body of Christ then let our allegiance be to it and it alone. May we seek the good of Christians rather than the good of the State. We can encourage our governments to restrict policies which exploit other nations and move to block others, such as China, from doing the same. Additionally, we can use our political clout to relive persecutions. We have the power; we should use it for the good of others instead of ourselves.

Conclusion

Our western post-colonial guilt and historical ignorance has blinded the Bride. We need to open our eyes adjust to the light, and seek the good of our global brothers and sisters. This will take careful thought, cooperation, grace, and wealth. It will not be easy but will require sacrifice. However, such is the way of Kingdom building.

Works Cited:

Jenkins, Philip. The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity. Revised and Updated. Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.

Knutsen, Torbjørn L. The rise and fall of world orders. Manchester University Press, 1999.

Mwaura, Ndirangu. Kenya Today: Breaking the yoke of Colonialism in Africa. Algora Publishing, 2005.


[1] Ndirangu Mwaura, Kenya Today: Breaking the yoke of Colonialism in Africa (Algora Publishing, 2005), 81.

[2] Return on Investment.

[3] Philip Jenkins, The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, Revised and Updated. (Oxford University Press, USA, 2007), 16-21.

[4] Torbjørn L. Knutsen, The rise and fall of world orders (Manchester University Press, 1999), 51.

[5] Jenkins, The Next Christendom, 155.

 

21 Oct

I attended Woodcrest Chapel, a Southern Baptist seeker-sensitive church in Columbia MO. As a seeker sensitive church, they were the very form of user-friendly – almost to a fault.

A person walking into the foyer would have a hard time distinguishing it from a mall. There was an open hallway full of people mingling. On the left side there was a coffee shop, a video cafe, and a bookstore. On the right side was the auditorium. Absent in the entire church (which was visible to the public) was any sort of Christian imagery.

sans-fog.JPG

View from the Pew – Sans Fog

Once inside the chapel (with my complimentary coffee in hand), I was treated to a rock concert with a message. With a couple of clacks of offstage drumsticks the curtain opened to reveal a full rock band, complete with an 80s-style signer at a piano. There were colored lights washing over the four guitarists, full drum set, the backup singers and the piano man whilst fog swirled about. The hippest praise music crashed about, vaguely extolling the glory of the Lord and our response to it. At the end of each hymn, the crowd, about half of whom were singing along, clapped in appreciation of the music. Entertainment was at a premium.

The pastor came out, set a $7k necklace down and recapped his sermon series on lying. He challenged the people out there who thought "Sure, lying is bad, but in the real world, you have to." At the end of his challenge the lights were cut and the piano man sang the crowd the ballad of "Don’t knock it if you’ve been here before," which consisted entirely of the repetition of titular line. [this was perhaps the most bizarre element of the service] Once finished, the lights lit up and the pastor went on with his sermon. The sermon boiled down to "God values you, so value your self as you really are, which includes always telling the truth." The $7k necklace was an object lesson. Production was at a premium.

I got in and out of there without speaking to a single person approaching me. The Church mirrored the community around it. It consisted primarily of white, upper class couples. I say primarily, because there were Black, Asian, and Latino people there – they were just in the minority – by a good margin. Yuppie came to mind. There were hardly any children there, mainly 30-60 year-olds. Which, incidentally, is the makeup of that part of town. It is the richest area of Columbia by far.

The Church primarily was focused – narrowly – upon building up the kingdom of God by means of healing the wounded. You wouldn’t think there was a focus, given their membership is in the 3k range and around 1-1.5k attend each Sunday. However, in looking in their program, seeing their bookstore, and listening to their rhetoric, it was clear that they were going after the wounded seeker, seeking to heal them and bring them into the fold.

There are all kinds of classes seeking to heal people from either past pains or current additions. A good friend of mine who is a recovering addict and is mentally disturbed swears by their recovery programs.

Equally telling was the rhetoric used by the lead pastor. More than once the pastor referenced himself as "the one pastor in town who makes sense" and decried "that Bible that you don’t pick up because it is a translation with archaic language." They are positioning themselves (in true Willow Creek fashion) for the people that are turned off by traditional Church. They also build into their service rhetoric they need to bring a friend and to get baptized "now that you are digging Jesus and his ways." They are unabashedly dedicated to teaching from the Bible. In sum, they are unapologeticly serving Christ, but apologetically Christian.

The pastoral staff is focused inward, perhaps too much so. Each time one of them comes and teaches at the BSU, they refuse to write anything new, stating that they will only use stock sermons because they want to focus all their energies upon their own congregation. It seems as if they want the members to bring people in and then they minister to them.

Lastly, as much as I half-mocked the over-produced Sunday service, I need to recognize that it is only half the battle (the other half is knowing).[1] Their real service (again, in true Willow Creek style) is held on Wednesday nights. This is for the dedicated core of their membership, not the curious or new initiates. I have not attended this service, so I am only basing the above off of their seeker service.

Grades

C (Incomplete). Without talking with the pastor, I am afraid to misrepresent him. Also, I have not seen the member service which makes it difficult to get passed the smoke and mirrors of the seeker service.

From bits and peices, one can infer that they are trying to enlarge the kingdom. This church in particular has one of the highest annual baptism counts in all of the Southern Baptist Convention.

They certainly are following the principle of the homogenous church unit as they mirror the immidate community around them. However, I don’t see them leveraging the vast wealth of that community towards helping others. Instead it was all about bringing in the rich and wealth wounded and meeting their needs.

However, people wet and in the pews are not an accurate measure of Kingdom work. I saw no mention of a ministry to the poor and with a stated to-date operating budget of 1.7 million (yes, million), I wonder how much the poor, widow, and orphan mean to them (which I hear is true religion form James). Every part of the seeker service revolved around one word: YOU.

Lastly, in order to bring in the wounded, they seem to think they have to draw a line between them and the Other Churches. They are the keepers of the intelligible, the relevant, the hip. The Other Churches are presented as stuffy, outdated, irrelevant, and most importantly, Other. For them to present true healing, they’ll need to more beyond the hubris of relevance and into the healing power of restoration of the unity of the Body of Christ.

[1] – Had to work in a 80’s GI Joe joke.

 

Husband Scorned and Fathers Ignored – A Social Analysis of the Acts of Thomas

03 Oct

 thomas I finally have posted my thesis in a series of pages:

Abstract

The Acts of Thomas was written by a community of Christians in eastern Syria sometime in the opening decades of the third century CE. The text quickly became popular both in the region and throughout Christendom. The text displayed a considerable amount of fluidity, being adapted by local Christians to better suit their own communities.  This celibate apocalyptic work encouraged its readers to completely reject the outside world in favor of its internal community.

Its composition and subsequent popularity attest to the desire of early third-century eastern Syrian Christians, and later Christians throughout the empire who adapted it, to reject the customs and power structures of Roman society.

One of the strategies by which some Christians resisted this Romanizing tendency of other Christians was the writing of Christian romances, more commonly and collectively known as the Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles. They rejected the ideal marriage and paterfamilial authority as the basis of society, opting for celibacy and devotion to Christ instead. These Christian romances advocated the negation of the Greco-Roman romances and, by extension, Greco-Roman society.

The Acts of Thomas, as one of these texts, rejected the world within which the authors found themselves. The writers, through the telling of Thomas’ escapades, encoded the text not only with this “cosmic no” of celibate apocalypticism, but also gave the receiving communities advice and direction of how to live out the “cosmic no” in their daily lives. Additionally, based upon their own communal experiences, or hidden transcript, as opposed to public expectation, or the public transcript, the writers offered up advice as to how one should navigate and respond to the inevitable conflicts that arise from living out their “cosmic no.”

As far as one can tell, the community consisted of adherents of all strata of society including a significant presence of women. Stories concerning either women’s conversion or conflicts that arise out of their conversion dominate the narrative. Structurally, the communities were founded and lead by wandering charismatic apostles. In their absence deacons were appointed by the apostles to shepherd the communities in the apostles’ absence. This analysis of the Thomasine community helps to unearth a picture of this Christian group which lay outside the developing proto-orthodox church. It not only helps recover the real lives of vanished people group, but also aids in understanding the varied responses to the Romanization of Christianity in the Empire in the opening decades of the third century. In addition to the social makeup of the compositional communities of the Acts of Thomas, one is also able to see how the community reacted in the face of persecution.

Update: I changed the post title to the title of my thesis.

 

Approaching Ancient “Heretics”

03 Oct

In my early Church history class, we talked about the early church fathers and heretics.  Today, I want to talk briefly about how we approach so-called heretical groups, for I am conflicted.  On the one hand, I reject their teachings as wholly unorthodox.  On the other, I realize that they have gotten the short end of the stick and have been woefully misrepresented throughout history, starting with the early church fathers.

FlammarionWoodcut

(Woodcut Depicting the Division of the Material and Spiritual Realms, with a shepherd breaking though the barrier between the two)

At MU, we stressed reading groups on their own terms for the purposes of understanding them. However, I recognize that we Christians are not in the business of merely understanding Other. Instead, we are in the business of spreading the Good News and ushering in beachheads of the Kingdom. As a consequent, we need to both articulate and distinguish our stances from others. And these collections of traditions we know as Gnosticism certainly fall in that other category.

Possible Misleadings:

“[because Jesus taught the truth] Error grew angry at him, persecuted him…” and “he was nailed to a tree.” – ValentinusIn our readings we only have one side of the story. We heard only from their opponents, and there is serious cause to think that they misrepresented some of the tenants of those whom the labeled Gnostic.[1] Critical readings of the Church Father’s attacks on Gnosticism or other Heretics demonstrate that they have not been nearly as fair to them as we might like them to be.[2]

For instance, we read in Irenaeus that “he who is held to be the god of the Jews” was set against the “unborn and unnamed Father” send “his first-begotten mind” that “suffered not” (was not crucified), but Simon was crucified in his stead.[3] In Valentinus’ Gospel of the Truth we find not only that Christ was sent from the father to save humanity, but that “[because Jesus taught the truth] Error grew angry at him, persecuted him…” and “he was nailed to a tree.”[4] We also see a oddly Trinitarian view of the unnamed Father, Christ, and the Holy Spirit.[5] We see talk of the Holy Spirit being the bosom of the Father and that the name of the unnamed “Father is the son.”[6] This is very similar to Tertullian’s notion that the Father is like the Sun, the Son is like the rays of the Sun, and the Holy Spirit is like the heat of the Sun.[7]

Still Standing within the [proto]orthodox stream:

The greatest areas of disagreement really seemed to center around the nature of salvation, whether was by means of the death of Jesus or by the gnosis that he brought (and was killed for).  My Canon and my tradition (the proto-orthodox) say that salvation was brought by the death of Jesus, not his [mere] teachings.

So, perhaps we are being too hard in our criticisms of the Early Church Fathers. They were certainly acting out of a motivation to preserve the core of Christian teachings against what they perceived as external threats. We have the benefit of hindsight.  I would argue that they were going through a process of self-definition. The created the proto-orthodox party out of the larger stream of self-identified Christian thought rather than fighting against outside attacks, for there was no standard yet – there was no canon, no system of creeds, they were making it up on the spot (and that is ok and well and good).

What is meant by “Gnosis”

I would challenge you and perhaps some of our forefathers on the nature of the term Gnosis. The idea of it being a secret bit of knowledge or a secret password is off, in my estimation. It was more like hidden understanding, like the type of understanding of persons between a married couple of 15 years, not a magical formula to be used and shelved like a key.

Conclusion:

Anyway, I’m not arguing for an inclusion of Gnostic thought in orthodox Christianity, just perhaps a softening and critical reading of the proto-orthodox criticisms and descriptions of it.

Works Cited:

Bettenson, Henry, and Chris Maunder. Documents of the Christian Church. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, USA, 1999.

King, Karen L. What Is Gnosticism? Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.

Meyer, Marvin, and James M. Robinson. The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The Revised and Updated Translation of Sacred Gnostic Texts Complete in One Volume. Int Rep Re. HarperOne, 2009.


[1] Karen L. King, What Is Gnosticism? (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005), 27.

[2] For an excellent discussion and criticism of Tertullian, Irenaeus, et.al. and their polemics, see “Gnosticism as Heresy” in Ibid., 20-54. Of particular note is the difference between the Valentinus’ worldview as constructed in his Gospel of Truth with Irenaeus’ construction of Valentinus’ worldview found on page 155.

[3] Irenaeus, Adv. Hae. I. xxiv. 3-5, “Conserning the Egyptian type” in Henry Bettenson and Chris Maunder, Documents of the Christian Church, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, USA, 1999), 36.

[4] Valentinus, The Gospel of Truth 18 as found in Marvin Meyer and James M. Robinson, The Nag Hammadi Scriptures: The Revised and Updated Translation of Sacred Gnostic Texts Complete in One Volume, Int Rep Re. (HarperOne, 2009), 40-41.

[5] Meyer and Robinson, The Nag Hammadi Scriptures, 41, 43, 49; King, What Is Gnosticism?, 155.

[6] Meyer and Robinson, The Nag Hammadi Scriptures, 43, 49.

[7] Bettenson and Maunder, Documents of the Christian Church, 38.

 

Early Church and the Trinity – Initial Thoughts

03 Oct

trinity As Christianity as a whole was figuring out how to reconcile the idea that God is one and both the father and Jesus are not the same and yet are God and that Jesus was somehow begotten, etc certain unacceptable ideas were presented and adopted by self-described Christians.  In the midst of these controversies, Tertullian was the first person to use the conceptual language of one substance, three persons to describe the nature of God.

Among the later-designated deviant views were the Monarchian teachings. They came in two dangerous formulations: 1) patripassianism (the conflation of the son with the father, or modalism) and Dynamic Monarchism(or adpotionism, also called Sabellianism).

Patripassianism suggested that the father and the son were the same thing, just assuming different forms.  In reality, there was no difference between the two.  It is like us wearing different shirts on different days.  When I am working at a bank I wear my tie, when I am at the creek, I wear my hideous denim cut-offs.  This view was attractive because it preserved the fierce monotheism of the Jews.

Adoptionism suggested that Jesus was fully human and only was the vessel for the Spirit of God from the time that he was baptized.  When the Dove descended upon him, he was possessed with the Spirit of God and adopted as his son.  This had precedent in Roman legal conceptions of adoption (see Augustus and Julian) and also made sense in terms of the anointed one of God in Jewish ideas.

Tertullian responded to these challenges by offering counter-explanations into the nature of the relationship between these three things that are one god… somehow. His formulations of that relationship were forerunners of the great Trinitarian creeds of the 300s.[1]

The Trinity, flowing down from the Father through intertwined and connected steps, does not at all disturb the Monarchy, or oneness of the divine empire. whilst it at the same time guards the state of the Economy. – TertullianIn speaking about Christ against adpotionism, he talks of one person and two natures using legal terminology and rhetoric.[2] In speaking against patripassianism, he uses the metaphor of the Sun, writing, “it is one substance, but has three manefestations, light, heat, and the orb itself.”[3] Heat stood for the Spirit, light to the Son, and the Father by the Sun itself. Thus it was impossible for there to only be one entity that was wearing three different hats.

So, we see in the patristic era internal arguments concerning the monotheism of God with the revealed persons of the now-called trinity.  I have sympathy towards the Adpotionists and the Monarchians because they certainly have Biblical support and the Spirit was nice enough to leave out the nature of its relationship to the Son and the Father in the Canonical writings.  However, I reject the Adoptionist and Manarchian claims and follow in the tradition of the proto-orthodox and orthodox views of God.  In later posts, I’ll talk about the councils that followed up on Tertullian’s formulations.


[1] Gonzalez, The Story of Christianity, Volume 1, 77.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Bettenson and Maunder, Documents of the Christian Church, 38.