RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘Christianity’

Reading Report

24 Jan

This week saw my obtaining of an Amazon Kindle.  I might post my thoughts on it later, but it has seen my reading shoot up this week.

Books

A Primer on Postmodernism

This week my Kindle came in the mail.  It’s not flashy, but what is does, it does well.  Also, I travel 30 miles to teach three days a week, and the Kindle’s text-to-speech feature saves me from listening to pop radio or Sean Vanity.

A Primer on Postmodernism by Stanley Grenz – The late Grenz was a fantastic Christian scholar who took the trajectory of Modernism and Postmodernism seriously without succumbing to either’s sly.  In this work he traces that trajectory up through Rorty. 

In the last section of the work, he looks at the common ground between postmodernism (as a secular body of philosophy) and Christianity and sketches out how Christianity needs to rip is frozen flesh from the static ice-block of Modernity and embrace and reject element of Postmodernity.  I cannot recommend this enough to people.

Short Stories

asimov
Asimov’s Science Fiction

In the last six months I have developed a keen love for short stories.  You enter a world, look around, and in space of a few cups of coffee, you bid it adieu.  You are not committed to a seven year contract at the end of which you get a Leah or a Rachel.  So, back to my point.  I started a guest subscription to Asimov’s Science Fiction.

My favorite story from this month’s issue was Stone Wall Truth by Caroline M. Yoachim.  It is the tale of Njeri, an African “Surgeon of the Wall”  The Wall was an ancient obsidian edifice which exposes and releases a person’s shadows when they are placed flayed upon it  The surgeon would entrap the soul of a person in a mind stone, flay the body, pin it to the wall, reconstitute the body, and with the soul restored, send the person to the healer.  In this story, Njeri confronts the ethics behind her occupation and discovers the truth about the wall.

Reading the Conan graphic novels turned me on to the genre of short stories, for that is how Robert E. Howard first published his stories of his Cimmerian hero.  Since getting the Kindle, I have been loading some his short stories.  This week I read a few of my favorites, such as The Frost Giant’s Daughter and The Elephant’s TowerI’m currently finishing up The Hand of Nergal.

As with all of Howard’s works that I have gotten my hands on (including the comics), these stories are great.  I love Howard’s critique of civilization through the eyes of Conan (his long standing debate with Lovecraft over the nature of civilization turn me on to this).  In the Elephant’s Tower, we see such a critique, after Conan has been ridiculed by a fellow thief:

The Cimmerian glared about, embarrassed at the roar of mocking laughter that greeted this remark. He saw no particular humor in it and was too new to civilization to understand its discourtesies. Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.

 

Readings from This Semester:

20 Dec

Total Pages: 3834

Total Pages Read: 3047

Total Reading Percentage: 79%

I actually did most of my reading this semester.  My TRP is hindered mostly by two source books which contain a great many more pages than were assigned.  The only book that I really skimped on was Redeeming the Routines.  I just did not have the time/gumption quotient high enough. 

The majority of the books were excellent.  There were a some I disagreed with (looking at you, Moreland).  Sourcebooks will be sourcebooks.  Some were even from the Reformed side of things.

I’ll try, in the coming week, to give feedback on most of the works shown above and listed below.

  1. Redeeming the Routines: Bringing Theology to Life by Robert Banks
  2. Documents of the Christian Church by Henry Bettenson
  3. To Know and Love God: Method for Theology (Foundations of Evangelical Theology) by David K. Clark
  4. Character of Theology, The: An Introduction to Its Nature, Task, and Purpose by John Franke
  5. The Story of Christianity, Volume 1: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation (Story of Christianity) by Justo L. Gonzalez
  6. Beyond Foundationalism: Shaping Theology in a Postmodern Context by Stanley J. Grenz
  7. Resident Aliens: Life in the Christian Colony by Stanley Hauerwas
  8. History of the World Christian Movement: Earliest Christianity to 1453 by Dale T. Irvin
  9. The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity by Philip Jenkins
  10. Readings in Christian Thought by Hugh T. Kerr
  11. Kingdom Triangle: Recover the Christian Mind, Renovate the Soul, Restore the Spirit’s Power by J. P. Moreland
  12. Christians at the Border: Immigration, the Church, and the Bible by M. Daniel Carroll R.
  13. Naming the Elephant: Worldview As a Concept by James W. Sire
  14. Kingdom, Church, and World: Biblical Themes for Today by Howard A. Snyder
  15. Models of the Kingdom by Howard A. Snyder
  16. Kingdom Come: How Jesus Wants to Change the World by Allen Mitsuo Wakabayashi
 

The Quest for Primitive Christianity – Impossible.

18 Dec

Many Christian movements have sought to cut ties with perverted and corruptible human traditions and return to that glorious (and Godly) pristine primitive Christianity described in the New Testament.  However, we don’t live in first century Rome and we aren’t powerless and poor.  The questions we bring to the text are our own and not those of the first believing communities.  If we only reply on the “naked text” we will get only naked answers.  Lints suggests that

Having rejected the aid of the community of interpreters throughout the history of Christendom, we have not succeeded in returning to the primitive gospel; we have simply managed to plunge ourselves back to the biases of our own individual situations.

Lints, Fabric of Theology, 93

So, in essence, by rejecting the wisdom of our elders, we swim in a sea of theological subjectivism  Oh, the irony!

bang

Perhaps we too are scared of what we might find find in the box!

 

Toward a Western Response to the Eastern and Southern Churches

03 Dec

We, as the North-Western Church, must tread carefully as we awaken to the present, past, and future realities of the Eastern and Southern Churches.   This post is a collection of some helpful ideas to that end. In many ways have many things which these other Churches lack. Chief among these are education, history, wealth, and political influence. This is not to say that we are exclusive holders of the Christian tradition or the exclusive keepers of the true truth which is truly true… as we have done in the past and do to ourselves so very often. The question before us is how to speak and listen without overpowering the Christian Other. We need to invest, tell our stories, plant and support seminaries, rethink missions, and place political pressure on our governments the whole while seeking the cause of Christ and listening to the Spirit while submitting to the Father.

Terminology and imagined hegemony

Just as there is no monolithic North-Western Church, there is likewise no monolithic Eastern, African, South American, Southern, South Eastern, Asian Church. This is the case for two very important reasons, internal diversity, and external unity. Each movement, denomination, congregation is unique to itself and lumping them together is dangerous and inaccurate.

It is dangerous insofar as it serves to maintain old and create new stereotypes.

It is inaccurate because the Cherubim and Seraphim movement has little to do with Musama Disco Christo Church though they are both in West Africa and neither of them have much to do with or connection to the congregations in the various disparate countries in South America or Asia.

We are better equipped to use such terms as Northern Church, Southern Church, African Church and the like as geographic containers rather than activators of essential features. However, despite this, Jenkins builds an undeniable case that the center of Christianity has and will continue to shift South and East. We in the West in the Church and the Academy are barely aware of this situation.

Investment, not Profit

In both Christian and Secular circles, dumping is the most common way we seek to help those in need. However, dumping aid upon people only serves to enslave them to our aid, replacing their dependence upon hunger with a dependence upon us while we pat ourselves on the back.[1] What we need instead is a de-emphasis upon aid and an emphasis upon investment in their congregations and societal structures. This can happen on several levels, individuals through micro-finance organizations such as Kiva or Opportunity International, at the congregation or denominational level, and finally on the governmental level as wield our political clout.

While we are doing this, let us remember the Biblical distaste for usury and let our investments be motivated by Kingdom building, not the great and powerful god ROI.[2] Let us be satisfied with 90% of the world’s wealth.

Gathering around the Campfire

Jenkins did a great job detailing the ancient roots of Christianity in Africa and Asia, which often hundreds of years older than our own faith trajectories. [3] As many of my fellow students said, we would be wise to listen to their stories and their wisdom.

They are correct, though we often sacrifice our stories at the altar of the unknown god paying our colonial debts.

However, we Western Christians have a long tradition full of stories, conflicts, mistakes, and triumphs as well. We can and should offer up this collection of stories to the rest of the body of Christ, not as authoritative, but as wisdom. We have faced many of the problems our sisters have faced. We were once persecuted; we were once poor.

We once drank from the cup of political power and are stained in blood by that sin.[4]

Our wisdom can be offered, though it cannot come without us listening to their stories. Once we think we own the wisdom, we have truly lost it. We can listen to their Now; they to our Not Yet.

The most difficult area here is the formulation of doctrine. Orthodoxy in middle America will look different than Orthodoxy in South Korea both of which will look different than Orthodoxy in the Congo. We have to remember that the Spirit speaking though the Bible is our prime authority and even then the revealed truths contained therein were formulated inside a specific geographic, temporal, cultural, linguistic location.

Teaching People to Fish

To help foster the growth and development of Christians in other areas of the world as loving siblings we need to found and support seminaries across the globe. And not just the seminaries themselves, we need to support students themselves.

In these seminaries scholars should be encouraged to write their traditions to give them a voice which can be exported to other areas of the globe.

While we are at it, it would be profitable to create some sort of interchange program wherein global seminaries send scholars to seminaries in other parts of the world. This would aid in a truly global conversation.

Curbing Missionary Redundancy

Central to recognizing the agency of Other Christians is the acknowledgement of and noncompetition with Other Christian missionary endeavors. Jenkins notes that this is one of the prime sources of inter-Christian conflict and we would do well to avoid it.[5] Unless there be a true heart of darkness that the gospel has not infected, we should focus our missionary efforts here at home where we are the most effective (where religion is dying)or partner with existing churches in the area.

Abusing Political Power for the Good of the Kingdom

If we truly see ourselves as one organ in the global-historical Body of Christ then let our allegiance be to it and it alone. May we seek the good of Christians rather than the good of the State. We can encourage our governments to restrict policies which exploit other nations and move to block others, such as China, from doing the same. Additionally, we can use our political clout to relive persecutions. We have the power; we should use it for the good of others instead of ourselves.

Conclusion

Our western post-colonial guilt and historical ignorance has blinded the Bride. We need to open our eyes adjust to the light, and seek the good of our global brothers and sisters. This will take careful thought, cooperation, grace, and wealth. It will not be easy but will require sacrifice. However, such is the way of Kingdom building.

Works Cited:

Jenkins, Philip. The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity. Revised and Updated. Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.

Knutsen, Torbjørn L. The rise and fall of world orders. Manchester University Press, 1999.

Mwaura, Ndirangu. Kenya Today: Breaking the yoke of Colonialism in Africa. Algora Publishing, 2005.


[1] Ndirangu Mwaura, Kenya Today: Breaking the yoke of Colonialism in Africa (Algora Publishing, 2005), 81.

[2] Return on Investment.

[3] Philip Jenkins, The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, Revised and Updated. (Oxford University Press, USA, 2007), 16-21.

[4] Torbjørn L. Knutsen, The rise and fall of world orders (Manchester University Press, 1999), 51.

[5] Jenkins, The Next Christendom, 155.

 

Liberal Democracy and the Need For War

18 Nov

Christians have historically had problems figuring out how they should relate to the political establishments in which they resided. As seen in an earlier post, Christians have been too eager to align themselves with Liberal Democracies, especially the United States.  In Resident Aliens, Hauerwas and Willimon critique this notion, saying that instead of being Christianity Lite™, Liberal Democracies need war to justify and solidify identity:

“States, particularly liberal democracies are dependent upon war for moral coherence.” [1]

Damn, I think that’s true.  I had previously viewed governments as sometimes morally good, often morally evil, but most of all, morally neutral. And here was an explanation that the best of these governments have a vested interest in unjust violence [2] . [3] Their warning from history is particularly poignant:

“if Caesar can get Christians [in 30’s Germany] to swallow the ‘Ultimate Solution’ and Christians here to embrace the bomb, there is no limit to what we will not do for the modern world.” [4]

6896

A Church that was nuked in Nagasaki.  Where do our allegiances lie?  With the USA, or with God Almighty?

  1. Stanley Hauerwas and William H. Willimon, Resident Aliens: Life in the Christian Colony, 1st ed. (Abingdon Press, 1989), 35. []
  2. if violence is ever justified []
  3. Though, we should expect states to act selfishly. []
  4. Hauerwas and Willimon, Resident Aliens, 27. []
 

Not the Red Flags of Marx and Mao, but those of Christ and Muhammad

09 Nov

In one possible scenario of the world to come, an incredibly wealthy although numerically shrinking Northern population expouses the values of humanizm, ornamented with the vestiges of liberal Christianity and Judaism.  Meanwhile, this future North confronts the poorer and vastly more numerous global masses who wave the flags not of red revolution, but of ascendant Christianity and Islam. 

Although this sounds not unlike the racial nightmares of the Cold War years, one crucial difference is that the have-nots will be inspired by the scriptures and the language of apocalyptic, rather than by the texts of Marx and Mao.  In this world, we, the West, will be the final Babylon.

——————————

From The Next Christendom by Jenkins.

 

Early Church and the Trinity – Initial Thoughts

03 Oct

trinity As Christianity as a whole was figuring out how to reconcile the idea that God is one and both the father and Jesus are not the same and yet are God and that Jesus was somehow begotten, etc certain unacceptable ideas were presented and adopted by self-described Christians.  In the midst of these controversies, Tertullian was the first person to use the conceptual language of one substance, three persons to describe the nature of God.

Among the later-designated deviant views were the Monarchian teachings. They came in two dangerous formulations: 1) patripassianism (the conflation of the son with the father, or modalism) and Dynamic Monarchism(or adpotionism, also called Sabellianism).

Patripassianism suggested that the father and the son were the same thing, just assuming different forms.  In reality, there was no difference between the two.  It is like us wearing different shirts on different days.  When I am working at a bank I wear my tie, when I am at the creek, I wear my hideous denim cut-offs.  This view was attractive because it preserved the fierce monotheism of the Jews.

Adoptionism suggested that Jesus was fully human and only was the vessel for the Spirit of God from the time that he was baptized.  When the Dove descended upon him, he was possessed with the Spirit of God and adopted as his son.  This had precedent in Roman legal conceptions of adoption (see Augustus and Julian) and also made sense in terms of the anointed one of God in Jewish ideas.

Tertullian responded to these challenges by offering counter-explanations into the nature of the relationship between these three things that are one god… somehow. His formulations of that relationship were forerunners of the great Trinitarian creeds of the 300s.[1]

The Trinity, flowing down from the Father through intertwined and connected steps, does not at all disturb the Monarchy, or oneness of the divine empire. whilst it at the same time guards the state of the Economy. – TertullianIn speaking about Christ against adpotionism, he talks of one person and two natures using legal terminology and rhetoric.[2] In speaking against patripassianism, he uses the metaphor of the Sun, writing, “it is one substance, but has three manefestations, light, heat, and the orb itself.”[3] Heat stood for the Spirit, light to the Son, and the Father by the Sun itself. Thus it was impossible for there to only be one entity that was wearing three different hats.

So, we see in the patristic era internal arguments concerning the monotheism of God with the revealed persons of the now-called trinity.  I have sympathy towards the Adpotionists and the Monarchians because they certainly have Biblical support and the Spirit was nice enough to leave out the nature of its relationship to the Son and the Father in the Canonical writings.  However, I reject the Adoptionist and Manarchian claims and follow in the tradition of the proto-orthodox and orthodox views of God.  In later posts, I’ll talk about the councils that followed up on Tertullian’s formulations.


[1] Gonzalez, The Story of Christianity, Volume 1, 77.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Bettenson and Maunder, Documents of the Christian Church, 38.