<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Backbone of Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hundiejo.com/the-backbone-of-ethics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hundiejo.com/the-backbone-of-ethics</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hundie Jo [dot] Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Real Ethical Relativity</title>
		<link>http://www.hundiejo.com/the-backbone-of-ethics#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Hundie Jo [dot] Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Real Ethical Relativity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=48#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>[...] all the ethics courses I have taken, deontology has reined supreme. Consequentialism is always seen as the easy way out for the morally weak. However, it seems to be [...]&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1258','Hundie Jo &#38;#91;dot&#38;#93; Com &#38;raquo; Blog Archive &#38;raquo; Real Ethical Relativity'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1258','Hundie Jo &#38;#91;dot&#38;#93; Com &#38;raquo; Blog Archive &#38;raquo; Real Ethical Relativity','&#38;#91;...&#38;#93; all the ethics courses I have taken, deontology has reined supreme. Consequentialism is always seen as the easy way out for the morally weak. However, it seems to be &#38;#91;...&#38;#93;'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all the ethics courses I have taken, deontology has reined supreme. Consequentialism is always seen as the easy way out for the morally weak. However, it seems to be [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1258','Hundie Jo &amp;#91;dot&amp;#93; Com &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; Real Ethical Relativity'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1258','Hundie Jo &amp;#91;dot&amp;#93; Com &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; Real Ethical Relativity','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; all the ethics courses I have taken, deontology has reined supreme. Consequentialism is always seen as the easy way out for the morally weak. However, it seems to be &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hundie Jo [dot] Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Backbone of Ethics, Part 2: Divine Command Theory.</title>
		<link>http://www.hundiejo.com/the-backbone-of-ethics#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Hundie Jo [dot] Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Backbone of Ethics, Part 2: Divine Command Theory.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=48#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>[...] mentioned in an earlier post, Objectivism is the &#8220;main squeeze&#8221; among Ethicists. This does not mean there is much agreement among them about out the [...]&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1257','Hundie Jo &#38;#91;dot&#38;#93; Com &#38;raquo; Blog Archive &#38;raquo; The Backbone of Ethics, Part 2: Divine Command Theory.'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1257','Hundie Jo &#38;#91;dot&#38;#93; Com &#38;raquo; Blog Archive &#38;raquo; The Backbone of Ethics, Part 2: Divine Command Theory.','&#38;#91;...&#38;#93; mentioned in an earlier post, Objectivism is the &#38;#8220;main squeeze&#38;#8221; among Ethicists. This does not mean there is much agreement among them about out the &#38;#91;...&#38;#93;'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mentioned in an earlier post, Objectivism is the &#8220;main squeeze&#8221; among Ethicists. This does not mean there is much agreement among them about out the [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1257','Hundie Jo &amp;#91;dot&amp;#93; Com &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; The Backbone of Ethics, Part 2: Divine Command Theory.'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1257','Hundie Jo &amp;#91;dot&amp;#93; Com &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; The Backbone of Ethics, Part 2: Divine Command Theory.','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; mentioned in an earlier post, Objectivism is the &amp;#8220;main squeeze&amp;#8221; among Ethicists. This does not mean there is much agreement among them about out the &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hundiejo Dev Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ok, I lied.</title>
		<link>http://www.hundiejo.com/the-backbone-of-ethics#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Hundiejo Dev Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ok, I lied.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsoundargument.com/blog/?p=48#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>[...] Moral equivalence? Nope. Israel shines in this one. Some may say that because Israel has killed more civilians they are the worse party and even call the acts terroristic. That is an awfully morally relativistic argument, is it not? Israel is not trying to kill any other than Hezbollah&#8217;s members. They are taking an many steps as they can to limit civilian causalities and still make safe their country. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has a goal of destroying the state of Israel and driving the Jews into the sea and hides amongst civilians for protection. As a matter of fact, the leader of Hezbollah may be hiding in the Iranian embassy. [...]&lt;div class="comment-remix-meta"&gt;&lt;a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1207','Hundiejo Dev Blog &#38;raquo; Blog Archive &#38;raquo; Ok, I lied.'); return false;"&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1207','Hundiejo Dev Blog &#38;raquo; Blog Archive &#38;raquo; Ok, I lied.','&#38;#91;...&#38;#93; Moral equivalence? Nope. Israel shines in this one. Some may say that because Israel has killed more civilians they are the worse party and even call the acts terroristic. That is an awfully morally relativistic argument, is it not? Israel is not trying to kill any other than Hezbollah&#38;#8217;s members. They are taking an many steps as they can to limit civilian causalities and still make safe their country. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has a goal of destroying the state of Israel and driving the Jews into the sea and hides amongst civilians for protection. As a matter of fact, the leader of Hezbollah may be hiding in the Iranian embassy. &#38;#91;...&#38;#93;'); return false;"&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moral equivalence? Nope. Israel shines in this one. Some may say that because Israel has killed more civilians they are the worse party and even call the acts terroristic. That is an awfully morally relativistic argument, is it not? Israel is not trying to kill any other than Hezbollah&#8217;s members. They are taking an many steps as they can to limit civilian causalities and still make safe their country. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has a goal of destroying the state of Israel and driving the Jews into the sea and hides amongst civilians for protection. As a matter of fact, the leader of Hezbollah may be hiding in the Iranian embassy. [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('1207','Hundiejo Dev Blog &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; Ok, I lied.'); return false;">Reply</a>  - <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('1207','Hundiejo Dev Blog &amp;raquo; Blog Archive &amp;raquo; Ok, I lied.','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; Moral equivalence? Nope. Israel shines in this one. Some may say that because Israel has killed more civilians they are the worse party and even call the acts terroristic. That is an awfully morally relativistic argument, is it not? Israel is not trying to kill any other than Hezbollah&amp;#8217;s members. They are taking an many steps as they can to limit civilian causalities and still make safe their country. Hezbollah, on the other hand, has a goal of destroying the state of Israel and driving the Jews into the sea and hides amongst civilians for protection. As a matter of fact, the leader of Hezbollah may be hiding in the Iranian embassy. &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
