Henry Imler May 13th, 2007
In terms of social costs, which is worse, smoking or drinking?
Read more as it pertains to this.
By the way - I hate smoking.
- Blogging
- Comments(3)

Henry Imler May 13th, 2007
In terms of social costs, which is worse, smoking or drinking?
Read more as it pertains to this.
By the way - I hate smoking.
worse, smoking does have a certain consistency that drinking doesn’t.
Smoking is ALWAYS dangerous to you and those around you. And most
people that smoke do so about 10-20 times/day. However, having a single
beer or drink isn’t harmful to your health, nor is it harming others.
Drinking is only dangerous when taken too far and smoking is dangerous
no matter what. But, when drinking is taken too far, it is another
story. I don’t think smoking is worth an R rating though. Something
tells me that move was more “save the earth/political” than actual
concern for young children. —–
I agree with you. What I am talking about is which has an overall
negative effect on society, not in personal situations. I meant which
one gets abused more and ends up actually hurting more people.
Why don’t we add marijuana to the discussion?
I bet you would see a lower social cost from marijuana than either tobacco or alcohol.
Yeah, I think one would - except for the high cost in incarcerations,
prosecution, and tax dollars being spent trying to fix a non-problem.
All the more reason to legalize it.
And by the way - I hate marijuana - I don’t want to legalize because I want to smoke it - just think prohibition.